California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value for Expansive Soil Subgrade Stabilized Using Brick Dust-Lime Mixtures

Authors

  • Ali Muftah Abdussalam Ezreig Civil Engineering Department, College of Technical Sciences, Bani Walid, Libya Author
  • M.O.M. Mashri Civil Engineering Department, College of Technical Sciences, Bani Walid, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65419/albahit.v5i2.136

Keywords:

Soil stabilization, Brick Dust, Lime, Compaction, California Bearing Ratio

Abstract

Expansive clayey soils are widely distributed in the southern semi-arid regions of the world. This study focuses on improving the strength of locally available expansive clayey soil using waste brick dust as a stabilizer and lime (CaO) as an activating agent. This approach provides a practical solution for recycling brick dust while mitigating environmental impacts. To determine the optimal lime content for soil stabilization, Atterberg limits, Modified Proctor, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were conducted, with 10% brick dust identified as the optimal proportion. To assess its effect on the physical and mechanical properties of expansive soil, varying proportions of brick dust (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) were mixed with the natural soil, along with a constant 5% lime content as a source of calcium oxide. The plasticity index results showed that the swell potential of the expansive soil decreased from very high to low when treated with the optimum mixture of 10% brick dust and 5% lime. In contrast, using 15% or 20% brick dust alone reduced the swell potential only from very high to medium. Furthermore, the addition of 10% BD and 5% L increased the CBR value of the natural soil from 4.71% to 22% within one day. Similar improvements were observed when 10% BD and 5% L were added separately. The optimum mixture of 10% BD with 5% L produced even greater results. The CBR value increased significantly after 14 and 28 days of curing. These results demonstrate the suitability of lime and brick dust as effective agents for the stabilization of expansive soil. Based on these results, it can be said that stabilization of expansive soils with brick dust is an effective method, making it suitable for improving the geotechnical parameters.

References

[1] Utkarsh, P.K. Jain, A review on innovative approaches to expansive soil stabilization: Focussing on EPS beads, sand, and jute, Science and Engineering of Composite Materials. 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/secm-2024-0005.

[2] N. Haque Nayem, Stabilization of Expansive Soil by Improving the Engineering Properties Using Lime and Fly Ash, International Journal of Engineering Management. 7 (2023) 27–34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20230702.12.

[3] S. GhavamShirazi, H. Bilsel, Characterization of volume change and strength behavior of micro-silica and lime-stabilized Cyprus clay, Acta Geotechnica. 16 (2021) 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01060-1.

[4] M. Macías-Párraga, F.J.T. Echarri, O. Alonso-Pandavenes, J. Garzón-Roca, Improvement of Expansive Soils: A Review Focused on Applying Innovative and Sustainable Techniques in the Ecuadorian Coastal Soils, Applied Sciences. 15 (2025) 8184. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158184.

[5] A.A. Mohammed, H. Nahazanan, N.A.M. Nasir, G.F. Huseien, A.H. Saad, Calcium-Based Binders in Concrete or Soil Stabilization: Challenges, Problems, and Calcined Clay as Partial Replacement to Produce Low-Carbon Cement, Materials. 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16052020.

[6] P. Sen, Effect of Chemicals on Engineering Properties of Soil, International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. V (2017) 1677–1685. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.10244.

[7] A.M.A. Ezreig, M.A.M. Ismail, K.I.. Ehwailat, A state of review : challenges and techniques of laterite soil stabilisation using chemical , economical , and eco friendly materials, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00821-z.

[8] A.M. Abdussalam Ezreig, M.A. Mohamad Ismail, K.I. Azarroug Ehwailat, Geotechnical performance of tropical laterite soil using palm oil fuel ash and activator magnesium oxide stabilizer, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 129 (2023) 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103293.

[9] S. GhavamShirazi, H. Bilsel, Characterization of volume change and strength behavior of micro-silica and lime-stabilized Cyprus clay, Acta Geotechnica. 16 (2021) 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01060-1.

[10] J.K.H. Wong, S.T. Kok, S.Y. Wong, Cementitious, pozzolanic and filler materials for DSM binders, Civil Engineering Journal (Iran). 6 (2020) 402–417. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091479.

[11] C. Gillot, The use of pozzolanic materials in Maya mortars: New evidence from Río Bec (Campeche, Mexico), Journal of Archaeological Science. 47 (2014) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.037.

[12] K.C. Onyelowe, M.E. Onyia, D.B. Van, H. Baykara, H.U. Ugwu, Pozzolanic reaction in clayey soils for stabilization purposes: A classical overview of sustainable transport geotechnics, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2021 (2021) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6632171.

[13] Y. Hong, X. Wu, P. Zhang, Construction technology and mechanical properties of a cement-soil mixing pile reinforced by basalt fibre, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9736465.

[14] X. Yao, K. Liu, G. Huang, M. Wang, X. Dong, Mechanical Properties and Durability of Deep Soil–Cement Column Reinforced by Jute and PVA Fiber, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 33 (2021) 04021021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003636.

[15] I.A. Baguhin, J.B. Ken Balangao, V.S. Karla Caingles, Soil Strength of Chemically Stabilized Road Subbase Materials With Lime Sludge and Fly Ash: a Statistical Evaluation Using Anova, Science International (Lahore). 2023 (2023) 405–409. https://hal.science/hal-04170006.

[16] Y. Yi, M. Liska, A. Al-Tabbaa, Properties of Two Model Soils Stabilized with Different Blends and Contents of GGBS, MgO, Lime, and PC, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 26 (2014) 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000806.

[17] K. Ramu, R. Dayakar Babu, Mitigating Problematic Expansive Soil by Using POFA, Lime and DRWPI, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 138 (2021) 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6564-3_8.

[18] A. Bhurtel, A. Eisazadeh, Strength and Durability of Bottom Ash and Lime Stabilized Bangkok Clay, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 24 (2020) 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0850-3.

[19] S. Teja, S. L., Kumar, S. S., Needhidasan, Stabilization of Expansive Soil Using Brick Dust, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 119 (2018) 1–8. http://www.acadpubl.eu/hub/.

[20] S. Paudel, B. Kumar Dahal, Effect of Brick Dust on Soil and Strength Improvement with the use of Plastic Waste, (2022).

[21] Marjom Ete, J.R.& A.K. Moni Mishra, Ravino Mekro, Lensar Jamir, Taniya Oniya, Experimental Investigation for Stabilization of Expansive Soil by Using Waste Materials—Brick Dust and Eggshell Powder, Geoenvironmental Engineering. 508 (2024). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3823-6_5.

[22] S.divya, K. Anusaya, P. P, V. Sobana, Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil using Groundnut, 6 (2023) 545–549.

[23] M. Kumar, Evaluation of experimental research on black cotton soil stabilization using stone powder, Materials Today: Proceedings. 37 (2020) 3490–3493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.389.

[24] ASTM D2487-10, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (unified Soil Classification System)., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-10.

[25] American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), D2487-17e1: Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International. (2020) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-11.2.

[26] ASTM-D-2216-98, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, ASTM International. (1998) 1–5.

[27] ASTM-D1557, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)), (2012).

[28] ASTM-D1883, Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.

[29] J. Wei, J. Wei, Q. Huang, S.M.I.B.S. Zainal Abidin, Z. Zou, Mechanism and Engineering Characteristics of Expansive Soil Reinforced by Industrial Solid Waste: A Review, Buildings. 13 (2023) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041001.

[30] Ezreig, Ismail, Ehwailat, Hydrophobic effect of soil stabilization for sustainable subgrade soil improvement, Materials. 15 (2022) 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093087.

[31] N.H.A. Rizal, M.A. Hezmi, R. Razali, N.A. Wahab, M.J. Roshan, A.S.A. Rashid, D.Z.A. Hasbollah, Effects of Lime on the Compaction Characteristics of Lateritic Soil in UTM, Johor, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 971 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/971/1/012031.

[32] H. Güllü, H. Canakci, I.F. Al Zangana, Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.070.

[33] M.S.I. Zaini, M. Hasan, Effect of Optimum Utilization of Silica Fume and Lime On the Stabilization of Problematic Soils, International Journal of Integrated Engineering. 15 (2023) 352–366. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2023.15.01.032.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value for Expansive Soil Subgrade Stabilized Using Brick Dust-Lime Mixtures . (2026). Albahit Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(2), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.65419/albahit.v5i2.136