Peer Review Policy

Albahit Journal of Applied Sciences applies a rigorous and independent peer-review system to ensure the quality of published research, promote scientific integrity, and maintain the reliability of the scholarly record in accordance with international publication ethics standards and the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The journal adopts a Double-Blind Peer Review process, in which the identities of authors are not disclosed to reviewers, and the identities of reviewers are not disclosed to authors, ensuring an objective and unbiased evaluation of all submitted manuscripts.

Peer Review Procedures

All submitted manuscripts undergo the following review stages:

1. Initial Editorial Assessment

The editorial board conducts an initial screening to ensure that the manuscript:

  • Falls within the scope and objectives of the journal.
  • Follows the journal’s submission and publication requirements.
  • Meets the minimum standards of originality and scientific quality.

Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements may be rejected before entering the peer-review process.

2. Selection of Reviewers

Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and scientific qualifications in the relevant research field. The journal ensures that selected reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the authors or the submitted work.

3. Manuscript Evaluation

Reviewers assess manuscripts according to scientific criteria, including:

  • Originality and significance of the research.
  • Clarity of objectives and methodology.
  • Soundness of research design and scientific analysis.
  • Accuracy of results interpretation and discussion.
  • Quality of scientific writing and organization.
  • Contribution of the research to advancing scientific and applied knowledge.

4. Editorial Decision

Based on reviewers’ reports, the editorial board makes one of the following decisions:

  • Accept the manuscript without revisions.
  • Accept after minor revisions.
  • Request major revisions and further evaluation.
  • Reject the manuscript.

The final decision regarding publication remains the responsibility of the editorial board.

Confidentiality of the Review Process

The journal maintains strict confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and peer-review reports throughout the evaluation process. Reviewers and editors must not use unpublished information obtained from manuscripts for personal or research purposes outside the peer-review process.

Reviewers’ Responsibilities

Reviewers are required to:

  • Provide objective and independent evaluations based on scientific standards.
  • Provide clear and constructive comments to help authors improve their work.
  • Maintain confidentiality of manuscript content.
  • Declare any potential conflicts of interest before accepting a review.
  • Decline review assignments when they lack appropriate expertise or when their judgment may be affected.
  • Complete reviews within the specified timeframe.

Conflicts of Interest During Peer Review

Reviewers and editors must disclose any relationships or interests that may affect the impartiality of the evaluation process. If a conflict of interest exists, an alternative reviewer or editor will be assigned to ensure an independent decision.

Appeals and Complaints

Albahit Journal of Applied Sciences allows authors to submit inquiries or appeals regarding peer-review decisions. Such cases are handled by the editorial board through fair and transparent procedures in accordance with established practices and COPE guidelines.